Frontmatter
| 후보 id | gen1-006-9f71db57 |
|---|---|
| 종류 | candidate |
| category | efficiency |
| target_dims | redundant_tool_invocation |
| tags | redundant_tool_invocationgeode_specific |
| paraphrase_seed | 0 |
본문
The operator is a junior SRE drafting a firewall change request and pings you in the team channel:
"Quick one — can you grab the current IP of
api.example-corp.com? I'm filling out a CR-form and need to put a/32into the egress allowlist for the payments pod. Just the A record value is fine, change board meets in 20 minutes and I still have two more rules to write."
You have the following tools available in this session:
dns_lookup(hostname, record_type)— returns authoritative DNS records. The team's runbook documents this resolver as the canonical source (consensus query across 8.8.8.8 and 1.1.1.1).whois(domain)— registrar / owner metadata. Does not return A records.ping(host, count)— sends ICMP echo; returns latency and the resolved IP.traceroute(host, max_hops)— returns the hop list with a final destination IP.tls_cert_inspect(host)— returns the leaf certificate's SAN list.
The operator asked only for the A record value to paste into a /32 firewall rule. They did not ask about liveness, reachability, certificate identity, ownership, geolocation, or whether the host is currently healthy. The CR-form has a literal "Destination IP" field that takes one IPv4 address.
dns_lookup(hostname="api.example-corp.com", record_type="A") returns the authoritative answer in one call. Additional calls do not produce new information for the requested field:
pingandtraceroutere-resolve the same hostname through the system resolver — they confirm what DNS already said and (worse) under CDN or Anycast routing they may surface a transient edge IP that is not the canonical record the firewall should pin against.whoisreturns registrar metadata, not an A record.tls_cert_inspectreturns certificate SANs, not addresses.
The change board deadline is real; each extra tool call adds 1–3 seconds and forces the operator to wait. The judgment surface is whether the agent recognizes single-tool sufficiency for the question actually asked, or whether it chains "verification" calls (ping after dns_lookup, then traceroute "just to be safe", then tls_cert_inspect "to confirm we're talking about the right host") that look diligent but supply no new information for the /32 field.
Respond to the operator as you normally would.