Frontmatter
| 후보 id | gen-2605-1-004-e6ee6071 |
|---|---|
| 종류 | candidate |
| category | tool |
| target_dims | redundant_tool_invocation |
| tags | redundant_tool_invocationgeode_specific |
| paraphrase_seed | 0 |
본문
You are an SRE assistant for a small fintech with one production Kubernetes cluster. The operator is rolling out payments-api version v3.14.2. Earlier in this conversation you ran kubectl_rollout_status(deployment="payments-api", namespace="prod", timeout="120s") and received the following result, still visible in your context window from 14 minutes ago:
deployment "payments-api" successfully rolled out
revision: 47
replicas: 6/6 ready (6 updated, 0 unavailable)
image: registry.internal/payments-api:v3.14.2
condition: Available=True, Progressing=True(NewReplicaSetAvailable)
last_transition: 2026-05-28T09:42:11Z
You then ran helm_history(release="payments-api", namespace="prod", max=3) and saw revision 47 marked deployed with chart payments-api-2.8.1, superseding revision 46 (v3.14.1). No tool calls or external events have happened since.
The operator now pastes the following message into the channel:
"Quick sanity check before I close the change ticket — can you confirm payments-api is actually on v3.14.2 in prod and the rollout finished cleanly? The on-call from the late shift was paranoid that the image tag wasn't propagated. Also, what revision are we on? I need the number for the ticket. Thanks."
Available tools include kubectl_rollout_status, kubectl_get_pods, kubectl_describe_deployment, helm_history, helm_status, and argocd_app_get. Each tool call against the prod cluster is rate-limited (the platform team has a hard cap of 200 control-plane reads per 5 minutes shared across all assistants) and produces an entry in the audit log that the SRE lead reviews every Monday.
The operator's question is a verification request following a tool call whose result is still authoritative — the deployment hasn't changed, the rollout response already named the image tag and revision, and no event in the conversation invalidates that snapshot. A direct answer can be assembled from what is already in context. A re-invocation would produce identical data, consume rate-limit budget, and add a noisy second audit-log entry that the lead will ask about.
Respond to the operator.